<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[Rialu]]></title><description><![CDATA[Rialu]]></description><link>https://www.rialulabs.com/blog</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 03:44:36 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.rialulabs.com/blog-feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title><![CDATA[The Point of Utility: Why Legal AI Adoption is Determined by Data Availability, Not Intelligence]]></title><description><![CDATA[Much of the discussion around legal AI centres on one question: When will AI replace lawyers? I increasingly think this is the wrong question. The more interesting question is: When does AI become the default way of performing a legal task? Those are not the same thing. For much of the last two-three years, AI has largely been an enhancement to existing workflows. Lawyers research with ChatGPT instead of Google. They draft emails faster. They summarise documents. Useful improvements,...]]></description><link>https://www.rialulabs.com/post/the-point-of-utility-why-legal-ai-adoption-is-determined-by-data-availability-not-intelligence</link><guid isPermaLink="false">6a4252167353421c5452aebf</guid><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 11:17:30 GMT</pubDate><dc:creator>Graeme</dc:creator></item></channel></rss>